N&
NOODLES & Co (NDLS)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 delivered modest top-line growth with accelerating comps but softer profitability: revenue rose 2.0% to $123.8M, system comps +4.4% (company +4.7%), while net loss widened to $9.1M ($0.20) and restaurant contribution margin fell to 10.3% on higher food, marketing, and training costs tied to the March 12 menu relaunch .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue was a slight beat ($123.79M actual vs $123.32M est), but EPS missed (-$0.20 vs -$0.11). Adjusted EBITDA of $2.4M was well below consensus EBITDA ($5.35M est)*, reflecting elevated launch costs and COGS mix; management quantified ~60 bps one-time COGS from the rollout and ~$0.5M higher marketing YoY .
- 2025 outlook largely reiterated; lower end of restaurant contribution margin cut by 50 bps to 12.0% (from 12.5%) to account for tariffs; planned company-owned closures increased to 13–17 (from 12–15). Other guidance points unchanged (revenue $503–$512M; G&A $49–$52M; capex $11–$13M) .
- Post-launch comps have held ~5% through April despite tough comparisons, supported by doubled media, broadened channels, and loyalty momentum—key catalysts if sustained and if margin rebuilds as one-time launch costs subside .
Note: Asterisked values from S&P Global consensus and actuals; see Estimates Context.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Sales momentum accelerated: system comps +4.4% (company +4.7%); traffic +1.8% and check +2.9% drove the lift; post–menu launch comps up ~5% through April .
- Menu/brand relaunch resonated: “We Know Noodles” campaign scored top quartile in Kantar testing; loyalty sign-ups and transactions increased; Taste Tour transactions more than doubled expectations .
- Management confident on foundation and balance sheet trajectory amid lower capex and cost savings: “well-positioned to strengthen our balance sheet this year,” with free cash flow expected positive in Q3 and Q4 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Profitability pressure: restaurant contribution margin fell to 10.3% (from 13.1% LY); Adjusted EBITDA dropped to $2.4M (from $5.5M LY), with COGS +160 bps (new items), higher other op costs (delivery fees, marketing), and training spend .
- Net loss widened to $9.1M and diluted EPS to -$0.20 as interest expense and operating deleverage offset sales gains .
- Guidance lower bound trimmed for margins and closures increased, reflecting tariff risk and continued portfolio pruning; liquidity remains tight (cash $1.4M; debt $102.7M) .
Financial Results
Revenue vs estimates (Q1 2025):
Note: Asterisked values retrieved from S&P Global; S&P EBITDA “actual” may reflect a different definition than company-reported EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA.
Segment/revenue mix (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Key KPIs and drivers:
Margin components (company-owned restaurants):
Liquidity (Q1 2025): Cash $1.4M; Debt $102.7M; RCF availability $19.3M .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are very pleased with the strong comparable restaurant sales and traffic performance we achieved during the first quarter... Since the new menu introduction, comparable sales have increased by approximately 5% through April.” — CEO Drew Madsen .
- “Our COGS in the first quarter were 26.6% of sales… primarily driven by higher food costs associated with our new menu offerings… Hourly wage inflation in the first quarter was 2.7%.” — CFO Mike Hynes .
- “We’re widening the lower end of our restaurant contribution margin range by 50 basis points to capture an estimated impact from tariffs… we believe our 2025 tariff exposure is limited.” — CFO Mike Hynes .
Q&A Highlights
- Marketing cadence: Media investment was roughly doubled around the launch and may be recalibrated as results warrant; creative broadened beyond LTOs to brand storytelling; strong response across channels .
- Loyalty and new guest response: Double-digit growth in loyalty sign-ups and transactions; 14-day Taste Tour significantly outperformed expectations .
- Margin puts/takes: ~$0.5M YoY increase in marketing, ~$1M of other one-time rollout costs (incl. ~60 bps COGS); COGS expected ~26% for remainder of year as launch obsolescence fades .
- Free cash flow: Slightly FCF positive in Q1; working capital headwinds in Q2; FCF positive in Q3 and Q4 expected .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: revenue beat by ~$0.48M ($123.79M vs $123.32M est); EPS missed by $0.09 (-$0.20 vs -$0.11 est); EBITDA meaningfully below consensus ($1.99M vs $5.35M est)*. Launch-related COGS mix, higher marketing, and training drove the shortfall despite stronger comps .
- Forward quarters (S&P Global): limited coverage; consensus EPS and revenue for 2H show small losses and low single-digit growth backdrop*.
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Note: EBITDA definitions may differ versus company-reported EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA; investors should compare like-for-like where possible.
Q1 2025 S&P Global consensus and actuals:
- Revenue: $123.32M est vs $123.79M actual*
- Primary EPS: -$0.11 est vs -$0.20 actual*
- EBITDA: $5.35M est vs $1.99M actual* / company EBITDA $0.70M; Adjusted EBITDA $2.40M
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The sales engine is reaccelerating post-relaunch (comps ~5% through April), aided by doubled media and a refreshed brand; durability of traffic gains is the key stock driver into 2H .
- Profitability recovery is the swing factor: as one-time rollout costs subside and COGS normalizes to ~26%, watch restaurant contribution margin progression vs the 12–14% FY guide .
- Tariff risk acknowledged but contained; margin guide lower bound widened by 50 bps—monitor produce/shrimp cost trends and any additional macro pricing actions .
- Balance sheet/leverage requires execution: cash is low and debt elevated; positive FCF in H2 and capex discipline ($11–$13M) are critical milestones .
- Third-party delivery dynamics improving from a Q3 algorithm-related trough; channel mix and fees impact “other op costs” and margin—pricing/markup strategy remains a lever - .
- Near-term trading setup: potential for upward revisions on revenue if comps sustain, but EPS risk persists until margin rebuild is evident; guidance credibility will hinge on Q2–Q3 flow-through and cost control .
- Medium-term thesis: if brand/menu strategy sustains demand and restaurant-level margins rebase within (or above) guidance, deleveraging could accelerate; unit closures should improve portfolio quality mix over time .
Sources: Q1 2025 8‑K and press release - -; Q1 2025 earnings call transcript -; Q4 2024 and Q3 2024 releases/calls - - - -.
Asterisked estimate values from S&P Global via GetEstimates.